A new intrusion campaign shows how quickly a Windows domain can be turned into a launchpad for deeper compromise. The operators used a Sliver command-and-control beacon, account creation, credential theft and remote administration to establish control after gaining an initial foothold.

The activity was staged from an exposed server and aimed at one unnamed US organisation. Its scripts were built for a real Active Directory environment, including a planned rollout across 18 hosts, while the recovered material contained no proof that ransomware was deployed in this specific incident.

Analysts at The Hunter’s Ledger identified the operation as a high-risk post-exploitation toolkit and tracked it as UTA-2026-024.

The research ties the infrastructure to a confirmed ransomware incident, but does not name the people behind this intrusion or conclude that they deployed an encryptor.

The Hunter’s Ledger said in a report shared with Cyber Security News (CSN) that the operators combined ordinary public tools with unusually detailed knowledge of the victim’s network.

The result was a durable access package designed to disable safeguards, steal credentials and keep its control channels available.

Hackers Disable Endpoint Protection

After entering the domain, the operators scripted the creation of an Active Directory account with a non-expiring password and added it directly to Domain Admins.

They also created a local administrator, enabled Remote Desktop Protocol access, and turned off Network Level Authentication, expanding the paths available for later movement.

The scripts stopped and disabled eight services associated with the victim’s endpoint protection product, then checked each service state.

They also collected the SAM, SYSTEM and SECURITY registry hives for offline password cracking, while a separate LSASS memory dump and Mimikatz supplied additional routes to credentials.

A central concern is the campaign’s persistence. Scheduled tasks ran as SYSTEM, used forged author details and included backdated registration dates.

Kill Chain (Source - THE HUNTER’S LEDGER) — Kill Chain (Source – THE HUNTER’S LEDGER)

One weekly task downloaded the latest attack chain without saving a fixed payload, a tactic similar to remote scheduled task delivery in EtherRAT attacks.

The team also manipulated the victim’s DNS content filter through its administrative interface. It added the attackers’ domain to an allowlist and placed a matching record in internal DNS, making the domain resolve internally and pass the same security control intended to block it.

This approach mirrors a broader pattern in Windows intrusions, where trusted administrative features become the delivery system after access is obtained.

Recent reporting on fake installer campaigns disabling Defender also showed attackers using installer workflows and scheduled tasks to weaken controls before maintaining access. In both cases, the danger is not a single tool but the sequence of actions surrounding it.

Blockchain C2 Complicates Response

Alongside Sliver, the toolkit used a Node.js implant that obtained its command server from an Ethereum smart contract.

The first domain recorded in that contract was the same one inserted into the victim’s DNS configuration, directly connecting the two seemingly different parts of the operation.

The contract changed domains five times over five months, making simple domain blocks short-lived. Yet the contract itself stayed unchanged and publicly readable, giving defenders a better tracking point.

The related beacon also contacted its main server every 60 seconds with no measured timing variation, a useful signal for network hunting.

The recommended response is to reset credentials across the affected domain, not solely for known accounts; review privileged-group additions and SYSTEM tasks; restore the DNS allowlist; rotate the filter administrator password; and remove planted internal DNS entries.

Teams should also look for RDP enabled with Network Level Authentication disabled and monitor the contract for later C2 changes. Security teams should favor behavior over broad signatures for public tools.

Baseline scheduled tasks, alert on fileless download commands running as SYSTEM and review sudden endpoint-protection service changes.

Readers examining related Windows tradecraft can compare Sliver implant activity targeting Germany and ransomware SYSTEM task abuse, which show how familiar components can be chained into an enterprise-wide incident. The pattern deserves sustained, careful attention.

Indicators of compromise (IoCs):-

Type	Indicator	Description
IPv4 address	`193.233.202.17`	Primary Sliver command-and-control and staging-server address
IPv4 address	`77.110.126.46`	Hardcoded third-tier fallback address, designated hunt-only
IPv4 address	`146.103.127.44`	Historical operator-used address from April 2026, designated monitor-only
Domain	`publisherresolution.com`	First C2 domain written to the Ethereum resolver contract
Domain	`resumeacceptable.com`	Historical Ethereum resolver C2 domain
Domain	`simultaneouslypower.com`	Historical Ethereum resolver C2 domain
Domain	`wiselystarting.com`	Historical Ethereum resolver C2 domain
Domain	`itemrange.com`	Most recently recorded Ethereum resolver C2 domain
URL	`https://publisherresolution.com`	Ethereum resolver contract value
URL	`https://resumeacceptable.com`	Ethereum resolver contract value
URL	`https://simultaneouslypower.com`	Ethereum resolver contract value
URL	`https://wiselystarting.com`	Ethereum resolver contract value
URL	`https://itemrange.com`	Ethereum resolver contract value
URL	`http://193.233.202.17:42718/task_39.ps1`	Fileless PowerShell download location used by the persistence task
File name	`svcload.exe`	Modified PrintSpoofer derivative
File name	`ws35.exe`	Reverse-shell sample containing the fallback address
File name	`ws36.exe`	Reverse-shell sample containing the fallback address
File name	`ws37.exe`	Reverse-shell sample containing the fallback address
File name	`ws_3srv.exe`	Reverse-shell sample containing the fallback address
File name	`task_39.ps1`	PowerShell payload retrieved by the scheduled task
File name	`slv_beacon_sc.bin`	Sliver beacon shellcode payload
Smart contract	`0xb3f2897f2bc797e5b9033faef8c81e92b01cb831`	Ethereum contract used to resolve the Node.js implant’s C2 location
MSI UpgradeCode	`{B3D67F25-0E3A-4B6B-965C-2C7610958983}`	Stable installer identifier observed in the MSI package
User-Agent	`Chrome/108.0.6602.492`	Hardcoded malformed User-Agent associated with the campaign’s request profile

Note: IP addresses and domains are intentionally defanged (e.g., [.]) to prevent accidental resolution or hyperlinking. Re-fang only within controlled threat intelligence platforms such as MISP, VirusTotal, or your SIEM.

Keep your SOC up to date on active malware & phishing within 24h of their emergence. Try ANYRUN to prevent incidents with early detection.

The post Hackers Disable Endpoint Protection and Deploy Sliver Across Compromised Windows Domain appeared first on Cyber Security News.